Cities are uniquely positioned to lead the country forward through innovation and ferocious experimentation. As we near the 2020s, it is apparent that the nation will need a social welfare system built for this new century and its specific challenges. One proposal governments are increasingly exploring is a policy now widely known as “universal basic income,” or UBI. The proposal represents a scalable solution that can help us reimagine and improve our social safety net, while encouraging us to reflect on the deeply changing nature of work.
A range of policy interventions will be needed to tackle these challenges and usher in a future without dramatic labor displacement, unemployment and precarious work. We should not entertain the fantasy that a single policy will tackle all of the above-mentioned challenges. Nonetheless, there is growing evidence that UBI may be uniquely placed to address some of them. This policy guide is intended to extend the conversation surrounding the role that cities can play in increasing equity through local experimentation.
Universal basic income (UBI) is a cash payment granted to all members of a community on a regular basis, regardless of employment status or income level. It is meant to be individual, unconditional, universal and frequent. The proposal has been extensively discussed recently in the American context by those growing wary of automation- and AI- induced unemployment and economic insecurity. UBI, according to many in Silicon Valley, could be part of the solution because it would ease the transition for those at risk of work displacement, stabilize incomes across the board and enable residents to pursue retraining and alternative forms of work.
See the chart below to find out which places are piloting UBI, and read our UBI guide to find out how to pilot it in your city.
Definitions
- Universal: everyone in a given location is eligible (for pilots, this may be a random selection of residents of low and middle income neighborhoods)
- Not Universal: targeted to a specific group
- Basic Income: the amount is approximately sufficient to meet basic needs
- Base Income: the amount is intended to be a supplement, but not to ensure basic needs
- Cash Transfers: one-time transfer of cash as opposed to regular installments
Project |
Location |
Implementing organization |
Dates |
Recipients |
Amount and frequency |
Universal basic income |
|||||
North Carolina |
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians |
Ongoing since 1996 |
All enrolled members of Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians |
Approx. $3,500-6,000 / 6 months |
|
TBD in 2019 |
Y Combinator Research |
TBD (3-5 yrs) |
1,000 residents of low- to middle-income neighborhoods |
$1,000 / month |
|
3 sites in Ontario, Canada |
Government of Ontario |
2017 – March 2019 (possible early termination) |
4,000 low-income individuals and couples (18-64 years old) |
Up to $16,989 per year for a single person, less 50% of any earned income
Up to $24,027 per year for a couple, less 50% of any earned income
Up to $500/month additional for people with disabilities |
|
Universal base income |
|||||
Alaska |
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (state-owned) |
Ongoing since 1982 |
All Alaska residents |
Approx. $1,000-$2,000 / year |
|
Stockton, CA |
Office of Mayor Michael Tubbs, Reinvent South Stockton Coalition, Reinvent Stockton Foundation |
Feb 2019 – Jul 2020 |
100 residents of low-to middle-income neighborhoods |
$500 / month |
|
Chicago Resilient Families Initiative (proposed) |
Chicago, IL |
Chicago Resilient Families Initiative Task Force |
TBD |
Proposed: 1000 families |
Proposed: $500 / month |
Basic income |
|||||
Jackson, MS |
Springboard To Opportunities |
2018 – 2019 |
16 low-income African-American mothers |
$1,000 / month |
|
Santa Monica, CA |
City of Santa Monica Housing and Economic Development |
Nov 2017 – ongoing |
21 low-income elderly, rent-burdened renters. Proposed expansion to serve up to 300 |
Calculated by household using the Basic Needs Subsidy Method, average of $500 / month |
|
Base Income |
|||||
New York City, NY New Orleans metropolitan area, LA Omaha metropolitan area, NE Twin Cities, MN |
University of California, Irvine Columbia University New York University University of Wisconsin-Madison |
2017 – 2022 |
1,000 low-income mothers with newborns |
$333 / month for 40 months for treatment mothers; $20 / month for 40 months for control-group mothers |
|
Chicago, IL |
Direct Giving Lab |
Ongoing since 2017 |
70 low-income families. Proposed expansion to 200 |
$100 / month |
|
Cash transfers |
|||||
Merced, CA |
Merced County Human Services Agency |
Ongoing |
Low-income individuals ineligible for CalWORKs and without children in the home |
Calculated based on individual need |