Housing Stabilization Bill on Hold in Senate
by Mike Wallace
Senate efforts have stalled to pass a landmark bill that
would address the housing and mortgage foreclosure crisis and strengthen the
economy by fostering stabilization of the housing market. The fate of H.R. 3221, the Housing and
Economic Recovery Act of 2008, remains in limbo because of a dispute over an
amendment that would extend a series of energy-related tax provisions.
The dispute is significant enough that passage of the
massive housing package may not take place until after the upcoming July 4
recess. Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) is
pushing to offer the energy provision and said he was willing to use all the
procedural tools at his disposal to try to force a vote on his amendment. The provision has no offsets and Democratic
leaders have indicated that they will not accept the amendment in its current
form.
NLC supports the landmark bill, which passed the House of Representatives
in May. NLC has been working with Senate leaders to pass
the bill so that a Senate House conference committee can address a few
remaining differences and the bill can be sent to the President before the
month-long August recess.
The bill, which has the bipartisan support of both Senate
Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and Ranking Member Richard Shelby
(R-Ala.), would give the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks much more active roles in helping
families at risk of foreclosure.
The bill would authorize FHA to refinance up to $300 billion
in distressed mortgage loans under a temporary “HOPE for Homeowners” program
that would help an estimated 400,000 homeowners in danger of losing their homes
by enabling them to refinance their mortgages into smaller, lower-interest
conventional loans. In exchange for this
assistance, homeowners under the program would be required to share any future
appreciation in home value with FHA.
Lenders would also have to forgive a portion of the loan’s
balance to qualify. In exchange, the
lender holding the original mortgage would get a final payout guaranteed by FHA
insurance regardless of the homeowner’s future ability to repay the refinanced
loan.
The new program includes a number of conditions to ensure
property speculators do not benefit, including a requirement that qualified
homes must be owner-occupied.
The bill would also establish an Affordable Housing Trust
Fund funded by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of the affordable housing goals
Congress set for the government-sponsored entities. The HOPE for Homeowners program would
initially be financed by the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, after which the
funds would go solely to the construction of new affordable housing.
Cities and states affected by high foreclosure rates would
also get help to mitigate the negative effects of the foreclosure crisis on
neighborhoods and municipal budgets. The
bill would make a one-time emergency allocation of nearly $4 billion in
additional Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to cities and
states to help stabilize neighborhoods distressed by rising rates of
vacant housing caused by foreclosure. These funds, which would go only to cities with very high foreclosure
rates, would be in addition to the funding provided for CDBG formula grants
under the normal appropriations process.
The bill would also give Federal Home Loan Banks new
authority to guarantee tax-exempt municipal bonds as an alternative to
traditional bond insurance, giving cities a new competitive financing option
for community and economic development and infrastructure improvement
projects. The President has objected to
both provisions, and has warned that their inclusion could lead him veto the
bill.
NLC is concerned over one troubling provision. The bill would provide a temporary new
standard deduction for homeowners who pay state and local property taxes, but do
not itemize their income tax deductions on their federal returns. Unlike
the House-passed bill, which provides an unconditional deduction, in the Senate
version, homeowners would be ineligible for the deduction if the state or local
jurisdiction raises property taxes. House Democratic staffers have indicated the House will likely insist on
the unconditional deduction when House-Senate negotiations begin.
|