Collaborating With Developers to Make Strip Redevelopment a Reality
by Maura K. Ammenheuser
This article is the third
in an occasional series about strip center redevelopment in first tier suburbs
supported by NLC’s First Tier Suburbs Council.
Developers
overhauling outdated community shopping centers say collaborating with suburban
governments is essential to a successful redevelopment project.
What developers want most, they say, is a
cooperative environment. Specifically, cities “can recognize that economics are
a major issue,” said Tony Brown, president of The Pelican Group, Mobile, Ala.
The degree of cooperation is
generally reflected in the ordinances dictating what developers can and cannot
do, and in local administrations’ willingness to bend or waive those rules on
occasion, sources have said.
However, cities
can’t generally do that, according to Keith McDonald, mayor of Bartlett, Tenn.
“There’s no slack to be cut,” McDonald said. “This is the law.” He said that cities shouldn’t be surprised by
federal or state building codes and standards, or by a city government that
appears inflexible.
Towns do
need someone on staff who understands why retail properties underperform, said
Brad Hutensky, president of The Hutensky Group, a Hartford, Conn.,
developer. Sometimes, local officials encouraging redevelopment should consider
non-retail uses that fall into what Hutensky called “gray” zoning, such as
health clubs or other nontraditional center tenants.
Sources
extolled the virtues of mixed-use redevelopments, especially those including
residential units. The inhabitants support the retail, breathe life into an
area and can generate additional tax income.
Adding
residential units is “a way of revitalizing a dead strip,” said Bill Hudnut, former
mayor of Indianapolis, and senior resident fellow at the Urban
Land Institute. "[Obsolete centers are] one-dimensional. We think they
need another dimension.”
Mixing several uses on one site is another instance
where public officials may need to tweak zoning or use broader discretion when
deciding what uses meet current zoning.
Regardless
of what uses are appropriate for the property, there are things cities can do
to encourage redevelopment.
James Maurin, former chairman of
the International Council of Shopping Centers and chairman of Stirling
Properties, a Covington, La., development company, said the government’s
role boils down to reducing the developer’s risk.
“Clearly, there is no way only
private capital will make it work [for some projects],” he said.
Taxes are a powerful incentive.
Local governments can utilize tax-increment financing, waive property taxes on
improvements for a certain number of years or tax a redeveloped property at a
lower rate than it would otherwise qualify for, even temporarily.
Sources listed other forms of
financial help, too. Towns may offer grants for refurbishing storefronts,
assemble land or condemn decrepit buildings for demolition.
Maurin acknowledged these
public-private deals are difficult to negotiate, “because [the developer is]
asking for a financial contribution and because the city has a wish list.”
The general
condition of the community surrounding a center plays a role in encouraging
redevelopments, too, because it affects a developer’s ability to lure fresh
tenants, said Warren Cooley, director of retail and economic development with
Valley Economic Development Center, a Van Nuys, Calif., business-development
nonprofit.
A well-maintained streetscape —
with roads and sidewalks in good condition, no overhead utility lines and
generally intact infrastructure — will attract new retailers. Lots of trees
help, too, one source noted. They provide shade and natural beauty.
But in a downtrodden area, “unless
something physically starts to happen” to improve the environment, a city won’t
accomplish change, Cooley said. Tackling the look and functionality of the
community at large is the government’s responsibility, not a developer’s, he
said.
Local zoning and other ordinances — anything from
building codes to parking requirements — can also affect a redevelopment effort
economically.
A town’s willingness to occasionally bend or break
those rules goes a long way, Brown said. He recalled one municipality that
compromised on a parking lot layout for a project. The city’s rules required an
island for every 15 spaces in the lot. The Pelican Group’s plans didn’t include
that many, but the city eventually allowed The Pelican Group to install islands roughly
every 17 spaces. Safety-related codes are understandably ironclad, but regulations dealing with cosmetic issues should be flexible, Brown said. In
this case, it kept The Pelican Group from spending big money to tear up more asphalt to
meet code.
But McDonald warned that cities don’t have as much
flexibility as developers may think especially to enforce
ordinances for one project and ignoring them for another.
“We can’t discriminate in that way,” he said. “It’s either
the law or it isn’t.”
Redevelopment and planning experts
say certain rules are particularly important.
Over time, municipalities insisting
on good design will reap more aesthetically pleasing commercial zones than
those that allow the often cheap, uninspired retail look of the past, said John
Shirey, executive director of the California Redevelopment Association.
A reason older community centers
falter is because they aren't interesting, he said. “There’s one single face
to the buildings — one uniform, long building with metal doors and uninteresting
windows.”
McDonald said developers face
restrictions today precisely because suburbs want to avoid gaining shopping
centers that will eventually deteriorate as badly as their predecessors from
the 1960s or 1970s.
“Many of us put into place laws and
ordinances so somebody doesn’t do that again,” McDonald said.
Hudnut sees walkability as
crucial, and believes two questions should be asked: Does a project encourage pedestrian access, and will people on foot
feel comfortable lingering there?
David Mogavero, president of
architecture firm Mogavero Notestine Associates, said suburban governments
should not compromise on “the quality of the building architecture or quality
of the site plan; the functionality of the community is the most important
aspect.” For example, does it protect pedestrians from automobiles or provide
appropriate landscaping? These questions go beyond the buildings, per se.
Other rules, such as traffic counts,
should bend for the greater good of encouraging pedestrian-friendly projects in
particular, Mogavero said.
Details: For more information, contact Christy
McFarland at (202) 626-3036 or mcfarland@nlc.org. All delegates at NLC’s Congress of Cities and Exposition are invited to attend the upcoming
meeting of the First Tier Suburbs Council on
November 15 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. The focus of the meeting will be strip center
redevelopment.
Maura K. Ammenheuser is a regular contributor to Shopping Centers Today, a publication of
the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). ICSC, an NLC Corporate Partner, is working closely with the First Tier Suburbs
Council in a study of strip center redevelopment.
|